Another Understanding of the Model of Genetic Code Theoretical Analysis

Petr Petrovich Garyaev

Institute of Quantum Genetics LLC, Moscow, Russia

Received 16 May 2015; akceptováno 27. června 2015; zveřejněno 30. června 2015

The present model is 50 years old

At present the model of the genetic code was (the code of protein biosynthesis) proposed almost 50 years ago by M. Nirenberg and F. Crick. The model has undergone severe erosion. Tactically, it is true that triplicity and the synonymous degeneracy are unmistakable. But the Nirenberg-Crick postulate about unambiguous coding of amino acids, i.e., the strategy raises reasonable doubt.

The reasons to doubt old model

The reasons to doubt showed up very early: it turned out that the triplet UUU codes both phenylalanine and leucine, which was inconsistent with the declaration of the unambiguity of the DNA-RNA encoding of amino acids in proteins. On the other hand, the ambiguity automatically stems from the Wobble Hypothesis by F. Crick relating to the wobbling of the third nucleotide in codons, (random, undetermined behavior), which means the 3′-5′ codon-anticodon pair is not involved in the encoding, and represents a “steric crutch”. In fact, amino acids are coded not by triplet, but by doublet of nucleotides in a triplet, according to “Two-out-of-Three” rule by Ulf Lagerkvist.

From this perspective, the codon families split into two classes: 32 codon-synonym triplets and 32 codon triplets with undetermined coding functions, that is inherent to one of the 32 codons UUU. These “undetermined” codons have called homonyms. They are ambiguous as they potentially and simultaneously encode two different amino acids,or amino acid and the stop function. However, the ambiguity is overcome in real protein biosynthesis. This is due to the sign orientations of ribosomes within mRNA contexts.

Analogy of the consciousness work in the human languages

This is the way the semantics of the codon-homonyms occur, as an exact analogy of the consciousness work in the human languages, abounding with homonyms. This turn in the understanding of the protein code, as actual text formation, leads to a strong idea of the genome as a quasi-intelligent biocomputer structure of living cells. Ignoring this leads to erroneous and dangerous works of genetic engineering (CRISPR), the most important results are Synthia bacteria with synthetic genome and GM foods. Protein biosynthesis is a key, but not the only basic information function of chromosomes.

Genome as a quatum biocomputer

There are other, no less important, holographic and quantum non-locality functions related to morphogenesis. In this plane, the work of the genome, as a quantum biocomputer, occurs on the wave level. Here the main function is regulatory quantum broadcasting of genetic-metabolic information on the intercellular, tissue and organism levels using a coherent photon DNA radiation and its nonlinear vibrational states (sound).

DNA in the form of dynamically polarized holograms

DNA information presents itself in the form of dynamically polarized holograms as well as phantom DNA structures. In the interpretation of the quantum work of the genome almost everything is hypothetical. Nevertheless, we have created a laser technology, to some extent simulating “sign wave” states of the genome, and are able to transmit genetic and genetic-metabolic information. Manifestations of phantom DNA, which we managed to detect in 1984 but published only in 1991 [Gariaev et al.,1991], are particularly interesting.

Laser produces phantom DNA

Now we can produce phantom DNA with our laser techniques and materialize it as a material structure in the PCR system [Gariaev et al.,2014 (a) Gariaev et al.,2014 (b)], as it was done earlier, but in their own way, by the team of Nobel Prize laureate, Professor Luc Montag-nier [Montagnier et al.,2012].

Far-distance quantum transmission of genetic information

However, back in 2007 and 2009 we demonstrated far-distance quantum transmission of genetic information for pancreas regeneration in rats [Gariaev et al., 2007; Gariaev,2009]. These data are the basis of Linguistic Wave Genetics (LWG).

Linguistic Wave Genetics and cystic fibrosis and Down Syndrome

The practical use of LWG principles is potentially large. So far, we have made precedents of regeneration of teeth, pancreas, and retina with full restoration of vision, cured cystic fibrosis and Down Syndrome, and returned mobility to the paralyzed.

LWG provides a method to program stem cells

LWG provides a method to program stem cells. LWG makes it possible to, in an environmentally friendly way selectively destroy pathogenic bacteria and viruses, insect pests and weeds in agriculture. LWG lays the foundations forquantum computing instead of digital.

Dr. Peter Garieav – DNA Frequency Experiments pt 1

The history of wave genetics has been developing for more than 80 years. In 20s and 30s of the last century Russian scientists, A G Gurwitsch and A A Lubishev postulated that not only does genetical apparatus of living organisms on the Earth operate at material, physical level but also at certain waves/fields level and is able to transfer genetic data/information via electromagnetic (EM) and acoustic waves.

Dr. Peter Garieav – DNA Frequency Experiments pt 2

Follow us

9 thoughts on “Another Understanding of the Model of Genetic Code Theoretical Analysis

  1. n95 masks says:

    I know that you may be trying to play it safe with this subject, but please remind yourself that the polarized lines of thinking can encourage healthy debate when argued with respect..and this IS your page so allow your content rule here!

  2. n95 masks says:

    Are you feeling sad? I’m concerned about you. Please be good to you.

Leave a Reply